Create an Account - Increase your productivity, customize your experience, and engage in information you care about.
SUMMARY: See this health alert for
Health District After-Hours Calls
Our after-hours communicable disease (CD) reporting line (425-339-5278) prompts clinicians to select “1.” This then will ring through to the Washington Poison Control Center, which serves as our after-hours call service. You will again be instructed to select “1.” Wait for the operator to answer and tell them you are trying to reach the Snohomish Health District communicable disease response on-call staff. After-hours calls should be reserved for immediately notifiable conditions (e.g., suspected botulism, shellfish poisoning, measles, meningococcal disease, rabies immunoprophylaxis). Visit https://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/5100/210-001-Poster-HCP.pdf for the full list of notifiable conditions sorted by reporting timeframes.
After hours call for non-communicable disease public health emergencies should be directed to 425-339-5295. The process is much the same as set forth above and also arrives to the Washington Poison Control Center for notifying our on-call duty officer.
How to Sign Up for Health Advisories
Please share this document with your workplace and other health care colleagues, especially those who are not signed up to receive our health advisories through our alert system. To sign up for health advisories for clinicians, please email SHDInfo@snohd.org with the following information:
Serologic Testing for SARS-CoV2
The recent emergence of assays for detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) has been met with high hopes among health care providers, patients, and the media. Testing platforms being offered include laboratory-based ELISA or chemiluminescent immunoassays as well as point-of-care lateral flow assays similar to pregnancy tests in concept. IgM antibodies typically appear within about seven days of onset of COVID-19 and IgG antibodies within four weeks. Aspirations for this technology hinge upon the supposition that recovery from COVID-19 affords at least short-term immunity and protection against re-infection. Potential applications include:
While these are some of the benefits we seek from serologic testing, they may not have arrived yet. Key concerns about widespread implementation or over-interpretation of results include:
Furthermore, this is a relatively unregulated and un-validated market of products—albeit due to the nature of the emergency we are in. Like the multitude of PCR diagnostics for SARS-CoV2, four serology market entrants have received limited Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and emergency use authorization for clinical use (Cellex, Vitro [Ortho Diagnostics], Mount Sinai Laboratory, and ChemBio). Six others have received emergency use authorization for research purposes only. The rest of the products on the market have utilized an additional pathway afforded by FDA policy that permits marketing and use of tests without prior FDA review, albeit with some provisions for internal manufacturer validation, notification, and labeling (including that the tests are not to be used as a sole basis for diagnosis). Consequently, sensitivity and specificity of these tests remain largely un-vetted, we are left to rely on manufacturer and vendor reports. In some cases, no information is available at all on a test’s performance.
Locally, the University of Washington Department of Virology’s validation of the Abbott Laboratories’ IgG assay showed that it offers about 50% sensitivity at two weeks after onset and “almost 100%” at 25 days. Specificity is reported at 99.67%. LabCorp is also bringing IgM, IgG, and IgA assays online, but test performance has not yet been reported in its marketing literature.
To demonstrate the impact of even small declines in specificity upon the predictive value of a positive test result when population prevalence is low, see the following table.
With nearly 2,500 COVID-19 cases reported to-date in Snohomish County and assuming that only 1-in-10 total cases are actually diagnosed and reported, then a rough estimate of prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV2 is 25,000 (~3%) county-wide. If population prevalence of COVID-19 antibodies is in the 2-5% range, even small decrements in specificity can result in the majority of positive results being falsely so. Not only should this prompt cautious use and interpretation of SARS-CoV2 serology, but it also explains why we also discourage respiratory PCR testing of patients who are asymptomatic—especially among those who have not had an exposure: false positive results may equal or exceed true positive results.
FDA is working with the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to develop a system for validation of these serologic tests. Meanwhile, the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics is conducting independent evaluations of both molecular tests and immunoassays, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, the University Hospitals of Geneva and others. Data from these evaluations are made publicly available as they emerge. A current plot of its findings in SARS-CoV2 serologic test sensitivity and specificity are as follows:
Source: FIND https://finddx.shinyapps.io/COVID19DxData/
In summary, regarding serologic testing for SARS-CoV2:
Chris Spitters, MDHealth OfficerSnohomish Health District